Skip to main content

Sinn Féin: Has their day come?

In an apparent moment of wisdom recently, somebody muttered to me: "There are two things you should never do in life: take heroin, or vote for Sinn Fein."


Sinn Fein TDs: Pearse Doherty, Gerry Adams, Mary-Lou McDonald, Martin McGuinness. Source: theJournal.ie

I thought this was interesting, and behind this stark statement I have heard many people discreetly share the same viewpoint in the run up to the general election. And I wanted to find out exactly why...

My granny has always been had a keen interest in politics, but has never had a soft spot for Sinn Fein. Many a time I have been treated to her using an array of colourful adjectives to describe the party's leader, Gerry Adams. I was always intrigued by this. Yes, my granny is a big Fine Gael supporter, but she doesn't seem to have the same level of hatred for Fine Fail or Labour that she begrudges Sinn Fein...

Eager to get to the bottom of this intrinsic loathing of Sinn Fein, I asked my mother. She summarised: "Gavin - I grew up during the Troubles. In my era, every day there was a newspaper headline or a news report telling of the latest victim of the ongoing Republican-Unionist feud." She referenced the alliances and links between the IRA and Sinn Fein which have been touted by the media throughout the years. I'm not going to try to validate or disprove any of those allegations. But, what I will say, is that a whole section of society is anti-Sinn Fein as a result. There is a large percentage of the population who will simply never vote Sinn Fein.


IPSOS MRBI/Irish Times Poll 22/02/2016 - Source: RTE.ie

I'm only 17 years-old, and I have been intrigued by the growing support for the party in the recent past. John Brady, the candidate in my constituency (Wicklow), is sure to get elected this week. Meanwhile, poles are suggesting that Sinn Fein holds 16% of the national vote. They seem to have cashed-in on a pronounced nationalistic spirit among those from poorer socio-economic backgrounds and capitalised on it by targeting their policies at those in society with the least money. So-called 'auction politics' has become a very obvious tactic by a number of parties in this general election.

Regardless of the party's policies, my parents are adamant that they will never vote Sinn Fein. Not because they feel the local candidate isn't experienced enough, not necessarily because they completely reject all of the party's agenda, but because of the party's origins and the history associated with it. Some might regard this as illogical and unforgiving, but frankly, in a democracy, each citizen has the right to vote for who and what they want.

For me and my peers, the troubles did not directly affect us in our lifetime. I don't think that we'll automatically disregard Sinn Fein because of the history linked to the party. That history is pontificated so frequently in the media even today, but we didn't live through it. It isn't so real to us.

I need to point out that there is a stigma attached to voting for Sinn Fein - A 'Shinner' is assumed to be either a die-hard republican, or someone from a lesser socio-economic background (who follows them based on their agenda which calls for more provisions for those least well-off in society). And I'm not suggesting that this is a fair assumption, and of course I'm not suggesting that there is anything wrong with a person who votes Sinn Fein. I'm interested to see if the branding of Sinn Fein voters in this manner will become out-dated in the years to come.

Party leaders and prominent members will move on. The past will be forgiven, but maybe never quite forgotten. Will Sinn Fein see a new era? Maybe that era is today... Friday will be the judge of that.





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Preference VS Protest: Democracy isn't a Competition.

 Shock and awe were evoked in Britons, among people across the European Union and in the greater world community today. The Brexit result left everyone in surprise. It was all very unclear as the polling stations closed last night. With a lack of exit polls, people were left to focus on odds set by bookmakers who ironically predicated the remain side winning. “I voted ‘no’ but I didn't foresee this outcome”   - the words of a bemused voter on the BBC this morning.   Almost with a tinge of regret, the man appeared to be piecing together the consequences of this landmark vote in his own mind as he answered the question. To him and many Britons, leaving the EU seemed so radical that it could never happen. Well I wonder if the thought crossed his mind that the government could take the Irish approach. That's the tactic which involves re-running a referendum and giving voters a little light encouragement to change their preference. It worked for us. But it see...
Post a Comment
Read more

Legal Process and Values

I was struck by a remark made by Jolyon Maugham QC in an interview with LBC's James O'Brien . Maugham is a high-flying tax lawyer turned Brexit crusader, leading a number of constitutional challenges to the English government's handling of matters since Art 50 was triggered. The conversation turned to how great lawyers are not innately good politicians (Keir Starmer's name was dropped with uncomfortable regularity). In fact, the two skillsets might be somewhat mutually incompatible. Maugham noted that lawyers are obsessed with process. By that he means not just the granular detail that the law requires, but a slavish focus on the rules as prescribed by the law and their application, as opposed to the substance or merit of those rules. Though this might seem a somewhat trite observation, it reminded me of a remark made by Michael Kirby, a former Australian High Court judge. Kirby J as he was identified in cases, was a senior judge for many years and was known colloquiall...
Post a Comment
Read more

The 'A Word'

"YOU support murdering children?"   It was a simple exchange. We were talking about faith in the modern world, and I foolishly dropped the 'A Word'. Hinting my feelings in relation to this controversial topic, I was immediately stopped in my tracks. My words had led to a judgement being made about my character and my personality. This headline from Waterford Whispers News summarises what has happened to the debate in Ireland: It's ironic, because since the debate has come into general public consideration in Ireland, it has almost become more of a taboo. A highly emotionally-charged debate, both sides will shoot the other down with provocative statements. People are afraid to open their mouths about it in case they are ridiculed for their views. This is exacerbated by the far-left and far-right musings on social media, suggesting that there is little or no middle-ground in this debate. Whatever side of the tracks you are on, or whether you have made ...
Post a Comment
Read more