Skip to main content

Forget the frogurt.

What the frogurt is frogurt, you ask? It's not the latest Game of Thrones character to be murdered, alas it is the latest abbreviation from the world of gastronomy. 'Frogurt' is a term used to describe frozen yogurt, an ice-cream equivalent that is the latest food phenomenon.

What irritates me about frogurt is not the stupid name, but moreso the way the treat has been marketed as a healthy option. Yes I'm sure it is the 'low-fat', healthier alternative to ice cream. I'm not here to argue the science of this trend, but I just feel that people are somehow under the illusion that because what they are eating is 'yogurt', it is magically good for them. Please don't tell me that you think chocolate flavoured frozen yogurt is healthy - it's a desert, plain and simple.

On any given weekend in Dundrum shopping centre, swarms of teens are to be seen Instagramming* their mountains of frogurt, scattered with a wide variety of unhealthy confectionery. Yep - the whole point is that you lace your natural frozen yogurt with a concoction of marshmallows, chocolate, jellies, oh! and a strawberry because you're remarkably health conscious.

The pesky offenders in question.
It reminds me of the 'Innocent' smoothies. Excellent branding with games and cool recipes on the back of the carton for kids. Innocent is a brand that conveys the message that their products are refined but simple and always honest. Of course, these fruity liquids weren't as straight-forward as they seemed: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/beware-the-smoothie-full-of-fruit-but-they-may-be-bad-for-you-406370.html

'Innocent's products have been promoted as a healthy option. However, a 250 ml bottle of 'Innocent Smoothie' contains 171 calories and 34.3 g of sugar. This is equivalent to three-and-a-half Krispy Kreme Original Glazed Donuts in terms of sugar content.'

Likewise, the 'Juicy Water' brand portrays the product as having natural and concise ingredients: water and juice. However, within the murky liquid and behind the PR gobeldy-gook lies a drink with more sugar than Coca-Cola. Would you care to take a sip now?

I think what I'm trying to say is that some marketing is really clever, and sometimes consumers are really naive. Just because a brand or product appears to be offering health benefits, or claims that it is low-fat, doesn't necessarily mean you should consume a lot of it!

We should be discouraging our children from consuming generally unhealthy foods and beverages, not permitting them because they have a certain health benefit or are better for you than their fattier equivalent. Look at the bigger picture, and look at your sugary, gluttonous combination of M&Ms, peanut butter and frozen yogurt and ask - Should I really be eating this?

Gavin


*HEALTH WARNING: Instagramming of food/beverages can aggravate friends and family, also often making your followers distance themselves from you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We've been spending most our lives livin' in an Anglicised paradise...

DISCLAIMER: This article has absolutely nothing to do with the 90s rap one hit wonder Coolio. He probably Googles himself from time to time and might come across this. There we were, about 10 minutes into a 3 hour journey on the Italian autostrada .. air conditioning was at full blast, we were slowly but surely getting the hang of driving on the right hand side and learning the local drivers idiosyncratic inability to indicate when changing lanes. I was sitting in the back and remembered a question posed to me by someone before I jetted off: “Do you have any Italian?” - a fair question, to which I responded: “Does the word pizza count?” . I asked the same question to my fellow travellers, hoping that when we reached our destination at least one of us would actually be able to converse in the vernacular. They admitted that they only had a few words. "How do you say ‘hello’ in Italian?” I piped up, alarmed by my own ignorance. There was an awkward silence as nobody could g

Live vs. Studio?

It is often said about artists - particularly the mass-produced pop variety - that they simply can't reproduce the slick sound of the studio recordings when performing live. Be that as it may, I think singer-songwriters (which are not of the said category) have the power to really bring something special to a tune when performing it live. And I don't necessarily just mean through the atmosphere or intensity that is present at a concert, but through the manner in which they perform it - the instrumentation, the speed, the style etc.  Mundy is an Irish singer-songwriter, he sort-of shot to fame in the late 1990's when one of his songs was featured in Bazz Luhermann's remake of 'Romeo and Juliet'. He has had a mixed career since - got back into the charts about a decade later with a cover of Steve Earl's song 'Galway Girl'. His version has become a classic and continues to be heard in country discos in the west of Ireland!! A song of Mundy'

The Unwatchable.

Source: The Sun - https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/nintchdbpict000351308634.jpg?strip=all&w=960 I don't know if your perception of a good evening's entertainment is watching people with intellectual disabilities being mocked on television? It certainly isn't mine. Channel Four's The Undateables  advertises itself as a "documentary series following people with challenging conditions who are looking for love." The title itself portrays the protagonists of this show as having such "challenging conditions" to the extent that they are rendered "undateable". According to Wikipedia, a spokesperson for the show defended criticism about the show's condescending name, stating that it is the public's perception that these people are 'undateable'. I do not identify as a member of the public, if this is the case. Furthermore, if this is the genuine public perception, would it not perhaps be more constructive