Skip to main content

A Tenacious Resolute Under-estimated Messianic Persuader.

Tenacious, Resolute, Under-estimated, Messianic, Persuader


It has been a surprise. Yes, I was shocked when I woke up on Wednesday morning. My dad who had been following the polls quite closely - mostly through Nate Silver's podcast - had been under the impression that Clinton would win. He was wrong. Likewise, I was sceptical about Trump's prevalence in the media and believed that all the hype and attention wouldn't necessarily correlate with the share of votes he would receive. I was wrong.

In the year of Brexit, little is beyond the bounds of possibility. The anti-establishment mentality that I touched on in a previous post following the British referendum has become ever more widespread. A lot of the things Trump had said were music to the ears of those living in the so-called 'rust belt'. He'd bring life back into their towns, which have been economic vacuums for many years. There aren't just economic and social chasms between the cities of the developed world and slums of the third world, these exist within the borders of developed nations also. Does Trump have the answer to these problems, though?

I'm going to examine a few elements of his campaign:

Irony.

He's a proponent of Capitalism - the free market, pro-enterprise economic system in which the market dictates the prices. Trump traded property and built his empire off the back of this system. This is the very same system that has short-changed the people voting for him. The reason that the large manufacturing plant left their town. The reason that they lost their jobs. The reason that they struggle to afford their utility bills.

Trump is a multi-billionaire businessman. How does a voting population - many of whom are unemployed or in low-payed jobs - relate to such a man? Many people I have spoken to have raised this point. In Ireland, certain people term politicians from middle-class backgrounds who stand for the views of the least well off in society 'champagne socialists'. They don't believe that the well-off can legitimately stand up for and act in the best interests of the less well-off. Perhaps there's a tinge of cynicism in this belief, but can Trump represent people whose lives and daily struggles are so alien to his?

Career Politics.

Trump has no political background. Seemingly this is a facet that makes him a perfect alternative to Clinton, who is of the Capitol Hill variety. Maybe it got people out that wouldn't have voted usually. Many cite the right not to vote as a symbolic action to express one's disinterest or dissatisfaction with the political system. With Trump - who's demeanour, manner and rhetoric juxtaposes the current political system - the disenfranchised may have been incentivised to vote.

Moreover the fact that voters had the choice of a businessman on the ballot was enticing. I suppose the notion is that 'he'll be shrewd with his finances' and that 'he'll know how to bargain and persuade'. They're fair assumptions, and many in Ireland would happily vouch for a particular prominent businessman to be Taoiseach for the same reasons.

Television Politics.

This is the era of TV politics. You've got to stand out and be memorable in the media. It's a 2 year ludicrous marketing campaign really (showcasing both the best and worst of public relations). Trump was the brand and he used a strong, catchy slogan. The media, who in many cases liked to hate him, he probably saw as his best friends as they provided him with a platform and plenty of exposure to his views. It was quite a spectacle, particularly over the last 3 months.

We'll pick the flowers, not the weeds.

That's a quote from Michael Moore by the way, who was totally anti-Trump. Nonetheless I think it is a phrase that sums-up the reasoning of many of Trump's voters: "Yes, we'll will accept that he has made a few choice comments; racist, misogynist and offensive, but we'll forgive him for that because his main message is good. He's going to bring jobs and prosperity back to us". It's almost an attitude of selective hearing: Just deliberately disregard the things he said that you deplore, in favour of praising the things he said that you agreed with. Although it seems now that this man has been elected, voters get the full package. They'll just have to put up with all his views, even if they don't register with many of them.

What will Trump really do? Will he be the unstoppable force that many have predicted? Will he be powerless in convincing members of congress to pass his proposals? Will he be one of the greatest presidents in the history of the United States? I don't know the answers to any of these questions, but we will soon see.

Though, has Donald Trump changed the realms of possibility in the political world? I certainly believe so.

Gavin.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Promoting Dublin's cycling culture

Let's face it. Dublin's cycle paths are un-attractive. Many times I have driven past a cyclist looking despondent, getting splashed when each passing car drives through a puddle next to him. One of the main cycle lane in the city is located along the N11. It's a fairly direct route, starting at Loughlinstown, before passing by Stillorgan, Donnybrook and eventually emerging at Leeson street just off St. Stephen's Green. However some cyclists would criticise it for having a poor surface in parts, and having issues with cars and buses travelling at close proximity to them. A contribution on a thread on Boards.ie from a cyclist who uses the N11 cycle lane frequently. I was sitting on the Luas a few weeks ago and a thought struck me. The Luas green line runs directly into St. Stephen's Green from Cherrywood. It originally had a terminus at Sandyford. This route is incredibly direct, passing through Dundrum, Milltown and Ranelagh before heading onto Harcourt street...
Post a Comment
Read more

The 'A Word'

"YOU support murdering children?"   It was a simple exchange. We were talking about faith in the modern world, and I foolishly dropped the 'A Word'. Hinting my feelings in relation to this controversial topic, I was immediately stopped in my tracks. My words had led to a judgement being made about my character and my personality. This headline from Waterford Whispers News summarises what has happened to the debate in Ireland: It's ironic, because since the debate has come into general public consideration in Ireland, it has almost become more of a taboo. A highly emotionally-charged debate, both sides will shoot the other down with provocative statements. People are afraid to open their mouths about it in case they are ridiculed for their views. This is exacerbated by the far-left and far-right musings on social media, suggesting that there is little or no middle-ground in this debate. Whatever side of the tracks you are on, or whether you have made ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Unwatchable.

Source: The Sun - https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/nintchdbpict000351308634.jpg?strip=all&w=960 I don't know if your perception of a good evening's entertainment is watching people with intellectual disabilities being mocked on television? It certainly isn't mine. Channel Four's The Undateables  advertises itself as a "documentary series following people with challenging conditions who are looking for love." The title itself portrays the protagonists of this show as having such "challenging conditions" to the extent that they are rendered "undateable". According to Wikipedia, a spokesperson for the show defended criticism about the show's condescending name, stating that it is the public's perception that these people are 'undateable'. I do not identify as a member of the public, if this is the case. Furthermore, if this is the genuine public perception, would it not perhaps be more constructive...
Post a Comment
Read more