Skip to main content

Apollo House - Gone but not forgotten

Apollo House on Tara Street in Dublin city centre, seized by citizens to
house the homeless in December of last year.
  Hard to believe that it's March already, isn't it? Apollo House has most likely left our minds at this stage. The media have certainly moved on to the other big stories of the day, namely the Garda whistle-blowing controversy, the leadership race for Fine Gael and Donald Trump.

There was a fantastic documentary about the 'Home Sweet Home' project on TV3 last week. It was filmed throughout the group's occupation of Apollo House and it profiles the decisions they made, the ideals behind the campaign and the public reaction to their actions. There are contributions from the figures behind the campaign such as trade union representative Brendan Ogle, musician Glen Hansard and director Jim Sheridan.

It was an incredibly daring undertaking, for sure. The act directed a huge amount of media attention to the gravity of the homelessness situation in the city. Its timing before Christmas certainly struck a chord with many. There's some interesting commentary about the campaign in this article from The Irish Times. Some labelled those behind the movement as martyrs, while others deemed them to be mere attention-seekers. Whatever your views are on the topic, this is a wonderful documentary and the story is told in a very poignant way.

I think that the campaign was a refreshing deed of activism in what can be perceived to be a passive and apathetic society. The notion of occupying a NAMA-owned building and to provide accommodation to the homeless was quite unprecedented.

Homelessness is a tragic problem, but in my opinion it is an incredibly complex problem. There are a myriad of social issues contributing to the level of homelessness on Ireland's streets today. The lack of housing supply is only one of them.

Here'd the documentary: http://www.tv3.ie/3player/show/1132/0/0/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Preference VS Protest: Democracy isn't a Competition.

 Shock and awe were evoked in Britons, among people across the European Union and in the greater world community today. The Brexit result left everyone in surprise. It was all very unclear as the polling stations closed last night. With a lack of exit polls, people were left to focus on odds set by bookmakers who ironically predicated the remain side winning. “I voted ‘no’ but I didn't foresee this outcome”   - the words of a bemused voter on the BBC this morning.   Almost with a tinge of regret, the man appeared to be piecing together the consequences of this landmark vote in his own mind as he answered the question. To him and many Britons, leaving the EU seemed so radical that it could never happen. Well I wonder if the thought crossed his mind that the government could take the Irish approach. That's the tactic which involves re-running a referendum and giving voters a little light encouragement to change their preference. It worked for us. But it see...

Legal Process and Values

I was struck by a remark made by Jolyon Maugham QC in an interview with LBC's James O'Brien . Maugham is a high-flying tax lawyer turned Brexit crusader, leading a number of constitutional challenges to the English government's handling of matters since Art 50 was triggered. The conversation turned to how great lawyers are not innately good politicians (Keir Starmer's name was dropped with uncomfortable regularity). In fact, the two skillsets might be somewhat mutually incompatible. Maugham noted that lawyers are obsessed with process. By that he means not just the granular detail that the law requires, but a slavish focus on the rules as prescribed by the law and their application, as opposed to the substance or merit of those rules. Though this might seem a somewhat trite observation, it reminded me of a remark made by Michael Kirby, a former Australian High Court judge. Kirby J as he was identified in cases, was a senior judge for many years and was known colloquiall...

The 'A Word'

"YOU support murdering children?"   It was a simple exchange. We were talking about faith in the modern world, and I foolishly dropped the 'A Word'. Hinting my feelings in relation to this controversial topic, I was immediately stopped in my tracks. My words had led to a judgement being made about my character and my personality. This headline from Waterford Whispers News summarises what has happened to the debate in Ireland: It's ironic, because since the debate has come into general public consideration in Ireland, it has almost become more of a taboo. A highly emotionally-charged debate, both sides will shoot the other down with provocative statements. People are afraid to open their mouths about it in case they are ridiculed for their views. This is exacerbated by the far-left and far-right musings on social media, suggesting that there is little or no middle-ground in this debate. Whatever side of the tracks you are on, or whether you have made ...