Skip to main content

Apollo House - Gone but not forgotten

Apollo House on Tara Street in Dublin city centre, seized by citizens to
house the homeless in December of last year.
  Hard to believe that it's March already, isn't it? Apollo House has most likely left our minds at this stage. The media have certainly moved on to the other big stories of the day, namely the Garda whistle-blowing controversy, the leadership race for Fine Gael and Donald Trump.

There was a fantastic documentary about the 'Home Sweet Home' project on TV3 last week. It was filmed throughout the group's occupation of Apollo House and it profiles the decisions they made, the ideals behind the campaign and the public reaction to their actions. There are contributions from the figures behind the campaign such as trade union representative Brendan Ogle, musician Glen Hansard and director Jim Sheridan.

It was an incredibly daring undertaking, for sure. The act directed a huge amount of media attention to the gravity of the homelessness situation in the city. Its timing before Christmas certainly struck a chord with many. There's some interesting commentary about the campaign in this article from The Irish Times. Some labelled those behind the movement as martyrs, while others deemed them to be mere attention-seekers. Whatever your views are on the topic, this is a wonderful documentary and the story is told in a very poignant way.

I think that the campaign was a refreshing deed of activism in what can be perceived to be a passive and apathetic society. The notion of occupying a NAMA-owned building and to provide accommodation to the homeless was quite unprecedented.

Homelessness is a tragic problem, but in my opinion it is an incredibly complex problem. There are a myriad of social issues contributing to the level of homelessness on Ireland's streets today. The lack of housing supply is only one of them.

Here'd the documentary: http://www.tv3.ie/3player/show/1132/0/0/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Promoting Dublin's cycling culture

Let's face it. Dublin's cycle paths are un-attractive. Many times I have driven past a cyclist looking despondent, getting splashed when each passing car drives through a puddle next to him. One of the main cycle lane in the city is located along the N11. It's a fairly direct route, starting at Loughlinstown, before passing by Stillorgan, Donnybrook and eventually emerging at Leeson street just off St. Stephen's Green. However some cyclists would criticise it for having a poor surface in parts, and having issues with cars and buses travelling at close proximity to them. A contribution on a thread on Boards.ie from a cyclist who uses the N11 cycle lane frequently. I was sitting on the Luas a few weeks ago and a thought struck me. The Luas green line runs directly into St. Stephen's Green from Cherrywood. It originally had a terminus at Sandyford. This route is incredibly direct, passing through Dundrum, Milltown and Ranelagh before heading onto Harcourt street...

The 'A Word'

"YOU support murdering children?"   It was a simple exchange. We were talking about faith in the modern world, and I foolishly dropped the 'A Word'. Hinting my feelings in relation to this controversial topic, I was immediately stopped in my tracks. My words had led to a judgement being made about my character and my personality. This headline from Waterford Whispers News summarises what has happened to the debate in Ireland: It's ironic, because since the debate has come into general public consideration in Ireland, it has almost become more of a taboo. A highly emotionally-charged debate, both sides will shoot the other down with provocative statements. People are afraid to open their mouths about it in case they are ridiculed for their views. This is exacerbated by the far-left and far-right musings on social media, suggesting that there is little or no middle-ground in this debate. Whatever side of the tracks you are on, or whether you have made ...

The Unwatchable.

Source: The Sun - https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/nintchdbpict000351308634.jpg?strip=all&w=960 I don't know if your perception of a good evening's entertainment is watching people with intellectual disabilities being mocked on television? It certainly isn't mine. Channel Four's The Undateables  advertises itself as a "documentary series following people with challenging conditions who are looking for love." The title itself portrays the protagonists of this show as having such "challenging conditions" to the extent that they are rendered "undateable". According to Wikipedia, a spokesperson for the show defended criticism about the show's condescending name, stating that it is the public's perception that these people are 'undateable'. I do not identify as a member of the public, if this is the case. Furthermore, if this is the genuine public perception, would it not perhaps be more constructive...