Skip to main content

A country awaits.

Across the country, the ballot boxes are being closed in the referendum on the 36th amendment to the Irish constitution. The referendum will decide whether to retain or replace the 8th amendment to the constitution, which endows the unborn with the equal right to life of the mother. This amendment was introduced by referendum in 1983 in light of the liberalisation of other countries' abortion regimes. Following the seminal US Supreme Court decision in Roe v Wade, there was a concern that the Irish Supreme Court could follow suit and legalise abortion in Ireland.

Here's an excellent video from the Irish Times chronicling how and why the amendment was introduced and its effects over the past 35 years.


Today it has been reported that the turnout in certain constituencies is remarkably high, and has eclipsed that in the marriage equality referendum. One affluent, young area near where I live is reported to have a turnout of 73%. In contrast, a constituency 40 minutes west of me was reported to have a turnout of just 36% at 7:30pm this evening. It will be interesting to see whether an urban-rural divide taints the results. Interestingly, the turnout for the 1983 referendum which introduced the 8th amendment to the Irish constitution was 53%. Today's higher turnout probably says a lot about our willingness to engage with this issue now, and the importance we now attach to this issue.

I've followed some excellent coverage in the Irish Times over the past number of weeks and months. The editorial has been impartial and comprehensive, and the Inside Politics Podcast with Hugh Linehan has distilled the campaign news of the week into an easily-digestible 30 minutes. Great journalism like this is certainly worth paying for.

I have been impressed by the media throughout the course of the campaign. Guidelines from the Broadcasting Authority did not require broadcasters to give equal time to each side of the debate, nor did it require a contribution from one side to be counteracted with a contribution from the other. These guidelines were adhered to pragmatically by broadcasters and there was healthy, fact-based debate. Broadcasters weren't afraid to stand their ground to ensure independence from pressure from either side, and presenters were quick to clarify matters which may have been incorrect.

The debates I listened to were largely respectful and civil. RTE redeemed itself in its second Claire Byrne debate, which was dignified in comparison to the first debate which featured insults from both sides, campaigners being labelled 'liars' and cheering from the audience.

Tonight we will see the exit polls on the referendum, and it is likely that we will have final results tomorrow afternoon.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

@rtesecretpro - An account that should never have gotten legs

Recently a controversial Twitter account by the name of ' RTE Secret Producer ' has emerged. Its premise: a brave RTE staff member stands up against their employer and sets out to expose the hidden culture which prevails within the organisation. It sounds like a plot to a low-budget thriller. The account has spurred much debate and has riled up many of the anti-RTE cynics who inhabit our country. Moreover, some of the Irish media - in competition with RTE and unlike RTE, not subsidised by the license fee - are probably happy to have a go at their media nemesis. I have a few thoughts about this Twitter account... First of all  I have read Facebook comment after Facebook comment praising this mystery staffer for their bravery and for being the good Samaritan to expose the ' flawed ' organisation. Although when one examines the level of 'exposure' through the Twitter account, one notices that this secret producer's ramblings amount to little more th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The 'A Word'

"YOU support murdering children?"   It was a simple exchange. We were talking about faith in the modern world, and I foolishly dropped the 'A Word'. Hinting my feelings in relation to this controversial topic, I was immediately stopped in my tracks. My words had led to a judgement being made about my character and my personality. This headline from Waterford Whispers News summarises what has happened to the debate in Ireland: It's ironic, because since the debate has come into general public consideration in Ireland, it has almost become more of a taboo. A highly emotionally-charged debate, both sides will shoot the other down with provocative statements. People are afraid to open their mouths about it in case they are ridiculed for their views. This is exacerbated by the far-left and far-right musings on social media, suggesting that there is little or no middle-ground in this debate. Whatever side of the tracks you are on, or whether you have made ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Back On Air!

I had a short break last week from my show. I promised myself that it would be an opportunity to get some study done. In actual fact I spent a few hours dreaming about being on-air, staring at my pile of notes. No, not particularly productive. It's funny - when you've been doing a particular routine like a show for weeks and weeks on end and take a night off, you actually kind of miss it.  I'll be going back on air in about 24 hours (Who's counting?!!) and I cannot wait. There's a great rush when you're on air - in control of a station and listening to your favourite tunes. There's also a bit of fun in preparing for the show - I try to keep it balanced between entertainment content, reading out requests and throwing in an anecdote here or there. A funny thing about being Irish: I think I inadvertently mention the weather at least twice every show. In fairness, people care about it and  it is definitively the best conversation starter in my book!! ...
Post a Comment
Read more