Skip to main content

Forget the frogurt.

What the frogurt is frogurt, you ask? It's not the latest Game of Thrones character to be murdered, alas it is the latest abbreviation from the world of gastronomy. 'Frogurt' is a term used to describe frozen yogurt, an ice-cream equivalent that is the latest food phenomenon.

What irritates me about frogurt is not the stupid name, but moreso the way the treat has been marketed as a healthy option. Yes I'm sure it is the 'low-fat', healthier alternative to ice cream. I'm not here to argue the science of this trend, but I just feel that people are somehow under the illusion that because what they are eating is 'yogurt', it is magically good for them. Please don't tell me that you think chocolate flavoured frozen yogurt is healthy - it's a desert, plain and simple.

On any given weekend in Dundrum shopping centre, swarms of teens are to be seen Instagramming* their mountains of frogurt, scattered with a wide variety of unhealthy confectionery. Yep - the whole point is that you lace your natural frozen yogurt with a concoction of marshmallows, chocolate, jellies, oh! and a strawberry because you're remarkably health conscious.

The pesky offenders in question.
It reminds me of the 'Innocent' smoothies. Excellent branding with games and cool recipes on the back of the carton for kids. Innocent is a brand that conveys the message that their products are refined but simple and always honest. Of course, these fruity liquids weren't as straight-forward as they seemed: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/beware-the-smoothie-full-of-fruit-but-they-may-be-bad-for-you-406370.html

'Innocent's products have been promoted as a healthy option. However, a 250 ml bottle of 'Innocent Smoothie' contains 171 calories and 34.3 g of sugar. This is equivalent to three-and-a-half Krispy Kreme Original Glazed Donuts in terms of sugar content.'

Likewise, the 'Juicy Water' brand portrays the product as having natural and concise ingredients: water and juice. However, within the murky liquid and behind the PR gobeldy-gook lies a drink with more sugar than Coca-Cola. Would you care to take a sip now?

I think what I'm trying to say is that some marketing is really clever, and sometimes consumers are really naive. Just because a brand or product appears to be offering health benefits, or claims that it is low-fat, doesn't necessarily mean you should consume a lot of it!

We should be discouraging our children from consuming generally unhealthy foods and beverages, not permitting them because they have a certain health benefit or are better for you than their fattier equivalent. Look at the bigger picture, and look at your sugary, gluttonous combination of M&Ms, peanut butter and frozen yogurt and ask - Should I really be eating this?

Gavin


*HEALTH WARNING: Instagramming of food/beverages can aggravate friends and family, also often making your followers distance themselves from you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Preference VS Protest: Democracy isn't a Competition.

 Shock and awe were evoked in Britons, among people across the European Union and in the greater world community today. The Brexit result left everyone in surprise. It was all very unclear as the polling stations closed last night. With a lack of exit polls, people were left to focus on odds set by bookmakers who ironically predicated the remain side winning. “I voted ‘no’ but I didn't foresee this outcome”   - the words of a bemused voter on the BBC this morning.   Almost with a tinge of regret, the man appeared to be piecing together the consequences of this landmark vote in his own mind as he answered the question. To him and many Britons, leaving the EU seemed so radical that it could never happen. Well I wonder if the thought crossed his mind that the government could take the Irish approach. That's the tactic which involves re-running a referendum and giving voters a little light encouragement to change their preference. It worked for us. But it see...

Legal Process and Values

I was struck by a remark made by Jolyon Maugham QC in an interview with LBC's James O'Brien . Maugham is a high-flying tax lawyer turned Brexit crusader, leading a number of constitutional challenges to the English government's handling of matters since Art 50 was triggered. The conversation turned to how great lawyers are not innately good politicians (Keir Starmer's name was dropped with uncomfortable regularity). In fact, the two skillsets might be somewhat mutually incompatible. Maugham noted that lawyers are obsessed with process. By that he means not just the granular detail that the law requires, but a slavish focus on the rules as prescribed by the law and their application, as opposed to the substance or merit of those rules. Though this might seem a somewhat trite observation, it reminded me of a remark made by Michael Kirby, a former Australian High Court judge. Kirby J as he was identified in cases, was a senior judge for many years and was known colloquiall...

The 'A Word'

"YOU support murdering children?"   It was a simple exchange. We were talking about faith in the modern world, and I foolishly dropped the 'A Word'. Hinting my feelings in relation to this controversial topic, I was immediately stopped in my tracks. My words had led to a judgement being made about my character and my personality. This headline from Waterford Whispers News summarises what has happened to the debate in Ireland: It's ironic, because since the debate has come into general public consideration in Ireland, it has almost become more of a taboo. A highly emotionally-charged debate, both sides will shoot the other down with provocative statements. People are afraid to open their mouths about it in case they are ridiculed for their views. This is exacerbated by the far-left and far-right musings on social media, suggesting that there is little or no middle-ground in this debate. Whatever side of the tracks you are on, or whether you have made ...