Skip to main content

Forget the frogurt.

What the frogurt is frogurt, you ask? It's not the latest Game of Thrones character to be murdered, alas it is the latest abbreviation from the world of gastronomy. 'Frogurt' is a term used to describe frozen yogurt, an ice-cream equivalent that is the latest food phenomenon.

What irritates me about frogurt is not the stupid name, but moreso the way the treat has been marketed as a healthy option. Yes I'm sure it is the 'low-fat', healthier alternative to ice cream. I'm not here to argue the science of this trend, but I just feel that people are somehow under the illusion that because what they are eating is 'yogurt', it is magically good for them. Please don't tell me that you think chocolate flavoured frozen yogurt is healthy - it's a desert, plain and simple.

On any given weekend in Dundrum shopping centre, swarms of teens are to be seen Instagramming* their mountains of frogurt, scattered with a wide variety of unhealthy confectionery. Yep - the whole point is that you lace your natural frozen yogurt with a concoction of marshmallows, chocolate, jellies, oh! and a strawberry because you're remarkably health conscious.

The pesky offenders in question.
It reminds me of the 'Innocent' smoothies. Excellent branding with games and cool recipes on the back of the carton for kids. Innocent is a brand that conveys the message that their products are refined but simple and always honest. Of course, these fruity liquids weren't as straight-forward as they seemed: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/beware-the-smoothie-full-of-fruit-but-they-may-be-bad-for-you-406370.html

'Innocent's products have been promoted as a healthy option. However, a 250 ml bottle of 'Innocent Smoothie' contains 171 calories and 34.3 g of sugar. This is equivalent to three-and-a-half Krispy Kreme Original Glazed Donuts in terms of sugar content.'

Likewise, the 'Juicy Water' brand portrays the product as having natural and concise ingredients: water and juice. However, within the murky liquid and behind the PR gobeldy-gook lies a drink with more sugar than Coca-Cola. Would you care to take a sip now?

I think what I'm trying to say is that some marketing is really clever, and sometimes consumers are really naive. Just because a brand or product appears to be offering health benefits, or claims that it is low-fat, doesn't necessarily mean you should consume a lot of it!

We should be discouraging our children from consuming generally unhealthy foods and beverages, not permitting them because they have a certain health benefit or are better for you than their fattier equivalent. Look at the bigger picture, and look at your sugary, gluttonous combination of M&Ms, peanut butter and frozen yogurt and ask - Should I really be eating this?

Gavin


*HEALTH WARNING: Instagramming of food/beverages can aggravate friends and family, also often making your followers distance themselves from you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 'C' Word: We Need To Speak About Sexual Education

"Over the coming years, your bodies will be changing." It was 2012, in an uncomfortable primary school classroom. This was it: the day that everyone had been anticipating for years. We heard whispers of what to expect from siblings over the weeks prior. We were nervous, anxious and very giddy. We were getting 'The Talk' . For those not from Ireland, 'The Talk' is the colloquial expression for the introduction sexual education class that primary school students receive at around the age of 12. It's an afternoon in which the girls go red as beetroots at the mention of menstruation and the lads hide their smirks and giggles with their jumpers when shown diagrams of the male anatomy. Unfortunately in my case and in the case of my classmates our introduction to sex education was the practically the extent of our sexual education. There's a reason that it's labelled 'the' talk, in the singular, I suppose. Over the 6 years following, we had p

Legal Process and Values

I was struck by a remark made by Jolyon Maugham QC in an interview with LBC's James O'Brien . Maugham is a high-flying tax lawyer turned Brexit crusader, leading a number of constitutional challenges to the English government's handling of matters since Art 50 was triggered. The conversation turned to how great lawyers are not innately good politicians (Keir Starmer's name was dropped with uncomfortable regularity). In fact, the two skillsets might be somewhat mutually incompatible. Maugham noted that lawyers are obsessed with process. By that he means not just the granular detail that the law requires, but a slavish focus on the rules as prescribed by the law and their application, as opposed to the substance or merit of those rules. Though this might seem a somewhat trite observation, it reminded me of a remark made by Michael Kirby, a former Australian High Court judge. Kirby J as he was identified in cases, was a senior judge for many years and was known colloquiall

Gender Balance on Irish Radio Playlists

Irish music has gone through somewhat of a renaissance over the past number of years. With an influx of new Irish voices, we have a diversity of genres in Irish music. No longer is this country’s repertoire limited to folk and rock. I was fortunate to have experienced this revolution first hand. From 2017-2018 I was presenting a Sunday night Irish music show on FM104 called the Open Mic. The producer and I always made a concerted effort to have diversity on each show, both in terms of gender and genres. From the hip-hop beats of Soule and Erika Cody to the blues of Wyvern Lingo and the experimental jazzy riffs of BARQ. It was a pleasure to hear all of these artists perform live. Also – it was a rare luxury to have a degree of control over what songs were played and what acts were interviewed. Usually decisions about the music are made by a programme director. This week, publicist Linda Coogan Byrne published research on the percentage of Irish female musicians played by