Skip to main content

The Unwatchable.

Source: The Sun - https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/nintchdbpict000351308634.jpg?strip=all&w=960

I don't know if your perception of a good evening's entertainment is watching people with intellectual disabilities being mocked on television? It certainly isn't mine.

Channel Four's The Undateables advertises itself as a "documentary series following people with challenging conditions who are looking for love." The title itself portrays the protagonists of this show as having such "challenging conditions" to the extent that they are rendered "undateable". According to Wikipedia, a spokesperson for the show defended criticism about the show's condescending name, stating that it is the public's perception that these people are 'undateable'. I do not identify as a member of the public, if this is the case. Furthermore, if this is the genuine public perception, would it not perhaps be more constructive, and more fundamentally human to challenge the public's narrow-minded, ignorant view? This show doesn't seem to attempt to do this.

The name is only the start. It seems to me that The Undateables sets up vulnerable people with intellectual disabilities for the purposes of entertainment. The show feeds off the naivety of its stars, The daters, in all their vulnerability, often do not realise that they are acting in a way which may appear comical. These moments of unintentional humour are penetrated into our Facebook feeds, in a desperate attempt to fish for likes.

Furthermore, doubt has been raised as to whether people with certain intellectual disabilities may be able to give fully thought-through consent to appear on the show. This might sound like a patronising viewpoint, but it is a genuine concern which was raised by a doctor and member of the British Medical Association who is also the mother of an autistic child.

"How do these programmes' producers ensure that participants who have autism or intellectual impairment can give truly informed consent to this potential consequence of them becoming reality TV stars?" - Dr Rachael Pickering

If the purpose of this show is not to mock disabled people and make their normal conduct into a form of entertainment, what is it?

To promote awareness about disabilities? - This is probable, and I'm sure it is thought-provoking for viewers.

To change people's perceptions about disabilities? - This could be a side-effect of the show, as such, but I don't think it is what the show really aims to do. We must bear in mind the view of the show's the spokesperson which I referred to earlier: that the public's perceive people with intellectual disabilities to be 'undateable'.

How would you like to be set-up, ridiculed and mocked, all for the benefit of somebody else to chuckle at your vulnerability? The answer to this question says all you need to know about The Undateables.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 'C' Word: We Need To Speak About Sexual Education

"Over the coming years, your bodies will be changing." It was 2012, in an uncomfortable primary school classroom. This was it: the day that everyone had been anticipating for years. We heard whispers of what to expect from siblings over the weeks prior. We were nervous, anxious and very giddy. We were getting 'The Talk' . For those not from Ireland, 'The Talk' is the colloquial expression for the introduction sexual education class that primary school students receive at around the age of 12. It's an afternoon in which the girls go red as beetroots at the mention of menstruation and the lads hide their smirks and giggles with their jumpers when shown diagrams of the male anatomy. Unfortunately in my case and in the case of my classmates our introduction to sex education was the practically the extent of our sexual education. There's a reason that it's labelled 'the' talk, in the singular, I suppose. Over the 6 years following, we had p
Post a Comment
Read more

Legal Process and Values

I was struck by a remark made by Jolyon Maugham QC in an interview with LBC's James O'Brien . Maugham is a high-flying tax lawyer turned Brexit crusader, leading a number of constitutional challenges to the English government's handling of matters since Art 50 was triggered. The conversation turned to how great lawyers are not innately good politicians (Keir Starmer's name was dropped with uncomfortable regularity). In fact, the two skillsets might be somewhat mutually incompatible. Maugham noted that lawyers are obsessed with process. By that he means not just the granular detail that the law requires, but a slavish focus on the rules as prescribed by the law and their application, as opposed to the substance or merit of those rules. Though this might seem a somewhat trite observation, it reminded me of a remark made by Michael Kirby, a former Australian High Court judge. Kirby J as he was identified in cases, was a senior judge for many years and was known colloquiall
Post a Comment
Read more

We've been spending most our lives livin' in an Anglicised paradise...

DISCLAIMER: This article has absolutely nothing to do with the 90s rap one hit wonder Coolio. He probably Googles himself from time to time and might come across this. There we were, about 10 minutes into a 3 hour journey on the Italian autostrada .. air conditioning was at full blast, we were slowly but surely getting the hang of driving on the right hand side and learning the local drivers idiosyncratic inability to indicate when changing lanes. I was sitting in the back and remembered a question posed to me by someone before I jetted off: “Do you have any Italian?” - a fair question, to which I responded: “Does the word pizza count?” . I asked the same question to my fellow travellers, hoping that when we reached our destination at least one of us would actually be able to converse in the vernacular. They admitted that they only had a few words. "How do you say ‘hello’ in Italian?” I piped up, alarmed by my own ignorance. There was an awkward silence as nobody could g
Post a Comment
Read more