Preference VS Protest: Democracy isn't a Competition.

Shock and awe were evoked in Britons, among people across the European Union and in the greater world community today. The Brexit result left everyone in surprise. It was all very unclear as the polling stations closed last night. With a lack of exit polls, people were left to focus on odds set by bookmakers who ironically predicated the remain side winning.

“I voted ‘no’ but I didn't foresee this outcome”

- the words of a bemused voter on the BBC this morning.

Almost with a tinge of regret, the man appeared to be piecing together the consequences of this landmark vote in his own mind as he answered the question. To him and many Britons, leaving the EU seemed so radical that it could never happen. Well I wonder if the thought crossed his mind that the government could take the Irish approach. That's the tactic which involves re-running a referendum and giving voters a little light encouragement to change their preference. It worked for us. But it seems there's no way back for the UK, not after David Cameron announced his resignation.

It seems to me that there has been a common thread throughout many of the Brexit voters’ rationale. The vote to many was seen as a protest against the government, perhaps a way to stick the two fingers up to the establishment. But it's this anti-establishment movement that is becoming apparent. So to say, people are dissatisfied with the current government and will vote for the alternative offering, whatever it may be, in protest against the current system.

Donald Trump, who can attribute his mainstream popularity to this anti-establishment sentiment.

It seems fair to cast a vote as a means of expressing one's dissatisfaction with the government. But one must live with the consequences of this vote, which may end up leading them to a life under a system worse than the one that they are protesting against. This, in my eyes, will be a reality for many Brexit voters. These dissatisfied voters should have used the referendum as an opportunity to seek reform and change in the current political landscape instead of trying to beat the system that they feel let down by. Democracy isn't a competition - it is not about trying to get 'one over' on somebody, it's about expressing your true preferences to achieve a country that represents you.

As Tony Blair remarked today on British television : “This was not a protest vote. This was a decision vote.”

Comments

The Unwatchable.

Source: The Sun - https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/nintchdbpict000351308634.jpg?strip=all&w=960 I don't know if your perception of a good evening's entertainment is watching people with intellectual disabilities being mocked on television? It certainly isn't mine. Channel Four's The Undateables advertises itself as a "documentary series following people with challenging conditions who are looking for love." The title itself portrays the protagonists of this show as having such "challenging conditions" to the extent that they are rendered "undateable". According to Wikipedia, a spokesperson for the show defended criticism about the show's condescending name, stating that it is the public's perception that these people are 'undateable'. I do not identify as a member of the public, if this is the case. Furthermore, if this is the genuine public perception, would it not perhaps be more constructive...

The 'A Word'

"YOU support murdering children?" It was a simple exchange. We were talking about faith in the modern world, and I foolishly dropped the 'A Word'. Hinting my feelings in relation to this controversial topic, I was immediately stopped in my tracks. My words had led to a judgement being made about my character and my personality. This headline from Waterford Whispers News summarises what has happened to the debate in Ireland: It's ironic, because since the debate has come into general public consideration in Ireland, it has almost become more of a taboo. A highly emotionally-charged debate, both sides will shoot the other down with provocative statements. People are afraid to open their mouths about it in case they are ridiculed for their views. This is exacerbated by the far-left and far-right musings on social media, suggesting that there is little or no middle-ground in this debate. Whatever side of the tracks you are on, or whether you have made ...

The right ends, the wrong means

The extraordinary din enveloped a tube station during rush hour. Commuters are usually quiet and passive, barely even mustering the energy to make eye contact with each other. This day they were a united front up against a group of Extinction Rebellion (XR) climate change protestors who were parading on the roof of a tram, preventing it from moving. This caused huge delays to commuters, going about their errands and trying to get to work. The very people who should have been commended for choosing to use relatively eco-friendly public transport over their carbon-intensive cars were made feel ashamed and annoyed by climate change protestors. This irony wasn't lost on most people. They got loads of publicity for their cause , say the XR defenders. Well for sure they did, but I think the media narrative portrayed them as villains, not heroes in this story. Also, for the last week we haven't been having conversations about the substantive issue of climate change, instead about th...

If in Dowd

Search This Blog